People Places Events In History Terms Organizations
Home Invites Members Groups Events Careers Videos News Photos Blogs Polls Forums Chat
Home > Blogs > Post Content

The New York Times Misleads Readers on Voter Fraud (650 hits)

After running a story about voter access laws last Sunday, the New York Times got some complaints from readers about its he-said-she-said treatment of whether voter fraud is a serious problem. Margaret Sullivan, the Times' public editor, asked the reporter and editor of the piece for their views:

The national editor, Sam Sifton, rejected the argument. “There’s a lot of reasonable disagreement on both sides,” he said. One side says there’s not significant voter fraud; the other side says there’s not significant voter suppression. “It’s not our job to litigate it in the paper,” Mr. Sifton said. “We need to state what each side says.”

Mr. Bronner agreed. “Both sides have become very angry and very suspicious about the other,” he said. “The purpose of this story was to step back and look at both sides, to lay it out.” While he agreed that there was “no known evidence of in-person voter fraud,” and that could have been included in this story, “I don’t think that’s the core issue here.”

This is a pretty remarkable response. I don't have a problem with giving both sides some air time, but by far the main focus of the voter access battle is stringent photo ID laws — and the only real justification for stringent photo ID laws is that it stops in-person voter fraud. (That is, the kind of fraud where people show up in person at a polling place and pretend to be someone they aren't. Even in theory, photo ID laws can't stop any other kind of fraud.) This means that the existence of in-person voter fraud is exactly the core issue. If you don't address the truth of that claim, you simply haven't done a good job of informing your readership.

And apparently Bronner knows this. He agrees that there's no known evidence of in-person voter fraud. So why on earth would he not make that clear in a story about voter ID laws? This wouldn't require him to take a stand on the laws themselves, only to point out to readers in his own voice that in-person voter fraud basically doesn't exist. They can then draw their own conclusions about whether voter ID laws are a good idea anyway and what the motivation for them is.

There are plenty of gray areas in the fight over voter access, which includes things like early voting hours, voter roll purging, and so forth. But on the specific subject of voter ID laws there are two clear facts: (a) the primary justification for the laws is in-person voter fraud, and (b) in-person voter fraud doesn't exist. Anyone writing about the subject is doing a disservice if they don't acknowledge this.
Posted By: DAVID JOHNSON
Monday, September 17th 2012 at 11:29PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
Learn what they called a slave
Open 24 -7 scholarship information
Free books
Learn your history
You must learn
JUL 6 The Name Yahweh in Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts
http://www.dhwtyslearningcenter.com/
http://www.dhwtyslearningcenter.com/
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home
Employer Showcase
>> more | add
Latest Jobs
Senior Marketing & Communications Director with Room to Read in San Francisco, CA.
ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT with Monroe Community College in Rochester, NY.
IT Associate, Level 2 (Provisional) / Systems Administrator with CUNY School of Public Health in New York, NY.
Administrative Officer III - Grants Manager with Department of Housing and Community Development in Baltimore City, MD.
Adjunct Faculty - Elementary Education BS, General (170083) with Polk State College in Lakeland, FL.
>> more | add
Latest Member Activity
scratchylus sene just posted a blog entitled 'sweet child precious little child scratchylusempressreggae kiddus i live @ vinyl thursdays ja'. 11:42PM
scratchylus sene just became a new member. 11:28PM
darlene sanders just became a new member. 01:37PM
isha sharma just edited her profile. 07:02AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'tazadaq & bryant's secured party creditor success story status correction done right '. 06:56AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'tazadaq , why doesn't my accepted for value work, is it a scam '. 07:07AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'i never consent to owing anything on the public side i discharge all public debts va public law 7310 '. 07:23PM
gregory boulware, esq. just posted a blog entitled '~ "by the bootstraps" ~'. 09:51AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'new york city housing and why you must learn contract law = contract = law always argue the contract '. 08:30AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'leanring to operate as a secured party creditor traffic infrations and child issues in the system '. 11:17AM
tazadaq shaah just posted a blog entitled 'realestate, nursing home, government benefits & secured party creditor '. 07:53AM
ebonie scott just became a new member. 05:13PM
>> more | invite friends