People Places Events In History Terms Organizations
Home Invites Members Groups Events Careers Videos News Photos Blogs Polls Forums Chat
Home > Blogs > Post Content
 The New York Times Misleads Readers on Voter Fraud (366 hits)
After running a story about voter access laws last Sunday, the New York Times got some complaints from readers about its he-said-she-said treatment of whether voter fraud is a serious problem. Margaret Sullivan, the Times' public editor, asked the reporter and editor of the piece for their views:

The national editor, Sam Sifton, rejected the argument. “There’s a lot of reasonable disagreement on both sides,” he said. One side says there’s not significant voter fraud; the other side says there’s not significant voter suppression. “It’s not our job to litigate it in the paper,” Mr. Sifton said. “We need to state what each side says.”

Mr. Bronner agreed. “Both sides have become very angry and very suspicious about the other,” he said. “The purpose of this story was to step back and look at both sides, to lay it out.” While he agreed that there was “no known evidence of in-person voter fraud,” and that could have been included in this story, “I don’t think that’s the core issue here.”

This is a pretty remarkable response. I don't have a problem with giving both sides some air time, but by far the main focus of the voter access battle is stringent photo ID laws — and the only real justification for stringent photo ID laws is that it stops in-person voter fraud. (That is, the kind of fraud where people show up in person at a polling place and pretend to be someone they aren't. Even in theory, photo ID laws can't stop any other kind of fraud.) This means that the existence of in-person voter fraud is exactly the core issue. If you don't address the truth of that claim, you simply haven't done a good job of informing your readership.

And apparently Bronner knows this. He agrees that there's no known evidence of in-person voter fraud. So why on earth would he not make that clear in a story about voter ID laws? This wouldn't require him to take a stand on the laws themselves, only to point out to readers in his own voice that in-person voter fraud basically doesn't exist. They can then draw their own conclusions about whether voter ID laws are a good idea anyway and what the motivation for them is.

There are plenty of gray areas in the fight over voter access, which includes things like early voting hours, voter roll purging, and so forth. But on the specific subject of voter ID laws there are two clear facts: (a) the primary justification for the laws is in-person voter fraud, and (b) in-person voter fraud doesn't exist. Anyone writing about the subject is doing a disservice if they don't acknowledge this.
Posted By: David Johnson
Monday, September 17th 2012 at 11:29PM


Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
''The tree of life'' is in you ,,,,, SEE PIC READ THE WORDS ,,,,
10 Pieces of Evidence That Prove Black People Sailed to the Americas Long Before Columbus
profile pic change
Is every body full of s>>t ?,,,,,fallacy ?
Mr. Farrakhan asks the question of the year to America....
HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO ALL
I can't believe NO ONE mentioned ANYTHING today about Nelson Mandela. Smh RIP July 18, 1918-December 5, 2013
the bible is about to get exposed ,,the Hebrew are on the run!!
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home
Employer Showcase
>> more | add
Latest Jobs
Collections Analyst with Parker Hannifin Corporation in Cleveland, OH.
Assistant Professor of Nursing with Eastern Illinois University in Charleston, IL.
Assistant Professor of Mammalogy and Mammalian Health with University of Maine in Orono, ME.
The Achievement Network is HIRING!!! with The Achievement Network in Multiple Locations (Boston, Chicago, Denver), US.
Writing Consultant (Part-time) - Writing Center (S982) with Azusa Pacific University in Azusa, CA.
>> more | add
Latest Member Activity
darryl hill just posted a blog entitled 'new update'. 07:39AM
a c powell just posted a blog entitled 'adding to the list'. 10:47PM
a c powell just became a new member. 10:33PM
gregory boulware just posted a blog entitled '~“how to kick a politician’s ass”~'. 08:03PM
gregory boulware just posted a blog entitled '"...it follows a pattern if you know what i mean!"'. 09:46AM
richard morris just edited his profile. 01:08PM
richard morris just became a new member. 12:51PM
gregory boulware just commented on a blog entitled '~“angel” means “messenger”~'. 06:45PM
gregory boulware just posted a blog entitled '~“angel” means “messenger”~'. 06:29PM
gregory boulware just commented on a blog entitled '“are people of color subject to the naacp!”'. 05:41PM
gregory boulware just commented on a photos entitled 'the day has come to pass'. 05:39PM
gregory boulware just commented on a blog entitled '“descendant” '. 05:39PM
>> more | invite friends