People Places Events In History Terms Organizations
Home Invites Members Groups Events Careers Videos News Photos Blogs Polls Forums Chat
Home > Blogs > Post Content
 The New York Times Misleads Readers on Voter Fraud (315 hits)
After running a story about voter access laws last Sunday, the New York Times got some complaints from readers about its he-said-she-said treatment of whether voter fraud is a serious problem. Margaret Sullivan, the Times' public editor, asked the reporter and editor of the piece for their views:

The national editor, Sam Sifton, rejected the argument. “There’s a lot of reasonable disagreement on both sides,” he said. One side says there’s not significant voter fraud; the other side says there’s not significant voter suppression. “It’s not our job to litigate it in the paper,” Mr. Sifton said. “We need to state what each side says.”

Mr. Bronner agreed. “Both sides have become very angry and very suspicious about the other,” he said. “The purpose of this story was to step back and look at both sides, to lay it out.” While he agreed that there was “no known evidence of in-person voter fraud,” and that could have been included in this story, “I don’t think that’s the core issue here.”

This is a pretty remarkable response. I don't have a problem with giving both sides some air time, but by far the main focus of the voter access battle is stringent photo ID laws — and the only real justification for stringent photo ID laws is that it stops in-person voter fraud. (That is, the kind of fraud where people show up in person at a polling place and pretend to be someone they aren't. Even in theory, photo ID laws can't stop any other kind of fraud.) This means that the existence of in-person voter fraud is exactly the core issue. If you don't address the truth of that claim, you simply haven't done a good job of informing your readership.

And apparently Bronner knows this. He agrees that there's no known evidence of in-person voter fraud. So why on earth would he not make that clear in a story about voter ID laws? This wouldn't require him to take a stand on the laws themselves, only to point out to readers in his own voice that in-person voter fraud basically doesn't exist. They can then draw their own conclusions about whether voter ID laws are a good idea anyway and what the motivation for them is.

There are plenty of gray areas in the fight over voter access, which includes things like early voting hours, voter roll purging, and so forth. But on the specific subject of voter ID laws there are two clear facts: (a) the primary justification for the laws is in-person voter fraud, and (b) in-person voter fraud doesn't exist. Anyone writing about the subject is doing a disservice if they don't acknowledge this.

Posted By: David Johnson
Monday, September 17th 2012 at 11:29PM

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
The Clown
My book will be out soon !!
When black people recognize the beauty of their blackness
MAMA IRMA YOU ARE LOVED
minister farrakhan shuts em down
NEW YORK NEW YORK
New York Members of the Zulu Nation Send a Warning to Popular Website ''World Star Hip Hop''
Very informative An Overview of the Ancient Egyptian Religion
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home
Sponsored Opportunities
Employer Showcase
>> more | add
Latest Jobs
Director of Prospect Management with Saint Mary's College of California in Moraga, CA.
Assistant Professor, Chemistry Department, Full-Time, Tenure-Track, Fall 2015 with Saint Mary's College of California in Moraga, CA.
Accessibility & Assistive Technology Coordinator for Student Disability Services with Saint Mary's College of California in Moraga, CA.
Application Developer with New York City Parks & Recreation in New York, NY.
Consultant Project Manager for Architecture with NYC Parks & Recreation in New York, NY.
>> more | add
Latest Member Activity
gregory boulware just posted a blog entitled '~growing up black in nazi germany~'. 11:58PM
zilla ouch just joined a new club (we are a chosen people). 07:50PM
zilla ouch just joined a new club (black artist of america). 07:48PM
zilla ouch just commented on a blog entitled '"what to the american slave is your 4th of july" (excerpt of frederick douglass's speech july 5, 1852)'. 11:41AM
zilla ouch just became a new member. 11:36AM
patricia may just became a new member. 09:39AM
wallace owens just posted a blog entitled 'he held on'. 04:40PM
lafayette renee jackson-williams just became a new member. 03:54PM
wallace owens just posted a blog entitled 'good to back'. 10:22AM
gregory boulware just commented on a blog entitled 'police brutality watch: black woman beaten senseless by california highway patrol officer'. 11:22PM
gregory boulware just commented on a blog entitled '"planned disenfranchisement; interdepartmental communication conspiracy - failure or a simple mistake?"'. 11:27AM
gregory boulware just posted a blog entitled '"planned disenfranchisement; interdepartmental communication conspiracy - failure or a simple mistake?"'. 10:44AM
>> more | invite friends